Annie Dillard is simply one of the best creative non-fiction writers living. She has the rare ability to put common experiences and abstract emotions into words, and the structure and beauty of her sentences are pretty well unrivaled. If you don’t believe me, pick up An American Childhood or Pilgrim at Tinker Creek – both books about everyday experiences that Dillard makes wondrous. Over the years, I think I’ve read every nonfiction book she’s written.
Still, can she write fiction? The Maytrees is her second fictive effort after The Living and the only novel by Dillard that I’ve read. It follows a couple who lives on Cape Cod through the 50 years of their relationship and explores how and why people love. The couple has a child, the man runs away with another woman, the other woman dies, the man comes back. Nothing revolutionary plot-wise.
First, let me say I liked it. The description of Provincetown is lovely and Dillard does what she does best: dissects little moments and little thoughts and puts words to feelings that we’ve never been able to find words for. Her sentences are as lovely as always and the story almost has the feel of a long poem.
On the other hand, it’s pretty clear that fiction isn’t Dillard’s strong suit. The largest problem I had involved simply understanding the story – much more attention is put toward how things are going on instead of what’s going on. There were many passages I had to read twice just to get the logistics of what was happening, and I don’t think Dillard meant for it to be confusing. There were several places were the numbers simply didn’t work (the main character’s age is wrong in several places, for instance, which immediately throws me out the reality of the world she’s created) and there were several places that didn’t make sense for hundreds of pages (one passage in the first ten pages makes you think that a character is murdered in the future, when in fact she dies of old age 200 pages later) and again, these confusing bits of writing didn’t seem to be there on purpose.
In the end, if you’re an Annie Dillard fanatic, this is worth picking up, just to be in awe of some of her sentences and to read her descriptions of the New England Coast. If you haven’t read much Dillard, I might skip this one in favor of one of her nonfiction books – although it isn’t unenjoyable, it does show that Dillard is much better at exploring our own world than at creating her own.




3 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://sarahaswell.com/2008/04/13/i-read-the-maytrees-by-annie-dillard/trackback/
April 14, 2008 at 5:04 pm
Adrienne
I’m always surprised when obvious inaccuracies, like the age discrepancy you noted, survive into publication. Isn’t that what editors are for?
April 14, 2008 at 8:24 pm
sarah
i know what you mean. and this happened within the first ten pages of the book, which made me read the rest of the book in a more critical light - not ever trusting what i read.
however, after working for a book publisher, it’s easy to see how these things happen, especially in a first edition like this one was. in the time i worked for pearson, i saw books go to print with the author’s name spelled wrong on the cover and worse. part of it is a matter of having *too many* people watching for mistakes - the biggest things slip by.
don’t get me wrong, though, the book is still very well written and worth picking up (especially since i know how much you appreciate the beauty of a sentence). maybe wait for the second printing?
April 14, 2008 at 10:53 pm
Megan
I felt almost exactly the way about this book that you did. Annie Dillard’s nonfiction work is some of my absolute favorite to read. I can read it over and over again because there are so many of those “aha! I have felt that very same thing, but could never articulate it!” moments, and the way she uses language is so beautiful. So. I was really excited to read “The Maytrees,” but I found those age discrepancies distracting, and I, too, got confused about the plot at times. It actually makes me feel better that someone else was confused too! So in sum, I enjoyed reading the book, but not nearly as much as I enjoyed “Pilgrim at Tinker Creek” or “Teaching a Stone to Talk” or really any of her other non-fiction.